End-to-end (E2E) tests are crucial for mobile apps—they simulate real user flows to ensure your app works across various devices and environments. But here’s the issue: E2E tests are resource-intensive, slow to write, and difficult to maintain. So why are mobile engineers, whose main focus is building the core app and shipping features, burdened with these tasks?

Why Mobile Engineers Shouldn’t Own E2E Tests:

• Time Drain: Writing and maintaining E2E tests pulls engineers away from their core focus—feature development. Mobile apps, with their wide range of devices and network conditions, make this especially complex.
• Burnout Risk: Engineers are already juggling multiple responsibilities, and adding E2E testing to their plate can lead to burnout, which eventually slows down feature delivery.
• Expertise Gap: QA specialists excel at designing tests that mimic real-world scenarios. Relying solely on engineers to handle testing could result in lower test coverage and missed edge cases.

‍

Why E2E Tests Are Still Important:

E2E tests are critical for ensuring smooth user experiences, especially for mobile apps with fragmented environments. But while these tests are necessary, engineers shouldn’t bear the entire burden of creating and maintaining them.

‍

How AI helps to solve the Problem:

AI-driven testing offers several advantages for E2E testing:

• Handling Unexpected Popups: AI can handle marketing popups or unexpected screens without breaking the flow, flagging them for review.
• Cross-Platform Execution: Write your tests in natural language—AI can execute them across Android, iOS, and web platforms.
• No Element Identifiers Needed: AI models work without relying on element identifiers or XML UI representations, making them compatible with frameworks like Flutter, Ionic, Swift, and Kotlin.
• Cross-Language Support: AI understands multiple languages, making your tests work seamlessly across different UI languages.
• Robustness: AI-based tests are resilient to code, layout, and copy changes. For example, if a "Sign Up" button changes to "Register Now," the AI can still identify and interact with it based on intent.

‍

AI-native testing tools make E2E testing more efficient, but there’s still guidance and testing required to maximize the AI's capabilities. Even if writing and maintaining test prompts is 2-3x more efficient than traditional methods, engineers still shouldn’t be the ones owning the process as it eats into their valuable time.

‍

How “GPT Driver - Autopilot” Solves the Problem:

To get comprehensive test coverage without a huge time investment from your engineering team, we offer GPT Driver Autopilot:

• Dedicated QA Owner: A dedicated QA expert to create and maintain automated tests, working closely with your team via a shared Slack channel.
• Trigger tests anytime via API: Run Automated tests with an API cal. We offer SLAs for human review to reduce noise and avoid false positives alerts to your team.
• Affordable Pricing: Starting at $499/month, we offer the most competitive pricing on the market for automated test coverage.

‍

GPT Driver Autopilot enables teams to trigger full regression tests daily on the development branch and run critical pre-merge tests as part of the CI/CD pipeline.

‍

For Teams with QA:

If you already have a QA team, we offer our No-Code Studio and Low-Code SDKs based on Appium to help your QA team automate 2-3x more test cases.